Customized Solutions
by Jeremy N. Smith
January 3, 2008
‘The
best solution’—that’s how top-tier logistics providers compete for customers
these days. Access to assets and modes is, more or less, the given that gets
providers into play. The big differentiator is the ‘soft’ side of the equation,
how they analyze their customer’s problem (with both logarithms and human
beings) and execute to plan.
World Trade decided to see how different experts and providers would respond to
the same situation. We asked the lead partner in the worldwide supply chain
practice of the respected PRTM consultancy, Shoshanah Cohen, and her colleagues
to develop a ‘hypothetical case study.’ Contributing editor Jeremy Smith then
surveyed a representative sample from the sector to learn their
recommendations.
Techbrilliance: A case study in inadequate supply chain visibility and unexpected transportation costs.
TechBrilliance
(TB), a leading developer of consumer electronics, made the strategic decision
to move the majority of its manufacturing operations to low-cost countries. As
part of this strategy, it established relationships with two major contract
manufacturers, as well as several original design manufacturers, both with
operations in Asia and Eastern Europe.
TechBrilliance maintained tight control over several key commodities, defining
and implementing sourcing strategies to ensure that global spending would be
routinely consolidated, all to the gain the greatest value from its new
suppliers. It also established a contract with a major international logistics
service provider for transportation of finished products from several factories
in China and Hungary to TechBrilliance distribution centers in Singapore, the
Netherlands, and Memphis.
Two of the major factors in TechBrilliance’s selection of its logistics partner
were the negotiated freight rates and the promise of product visibility as it
moved between the manufacturing location and the selected distribution center.
Now, this promised visibility has been slow to materialize.
TechBrilliance planners complain that they lose track of inventory once it
leaves the factory and are forced to make decisions based on the expected
transit lead-time, rather than a firm date from the logistics partner.
“We’ve learned that we can’t use the scheduled delivery date to make customer
commitments because they’re routinely off by as much as two weeks,” explains
Allan George, TechBrilliance chief executive officer. “Sometimes we get
notification that a shipment is in transit and then we find out from someone on
the ground in China that the container is still sitting in the port. And,
sometimes we know it’s arrived in the U.S., and we don’t actually see the
product in Memphis until ten days later. When we try to find out what’s really
going on, we get totally inconsistent responses.”
The management team is also concerned that invoices contain little detail about
specific shipments.
“We can see the total bill for a week, but we can’t see details about what was
in each shipment,” says Bill Jones, TechBrilliance senior vice president,
purchasing. “That makes it very difficult to allocate costs to a specific product.”
The company’s biggest question: how now to proceed?
“I see the negotiated freight costs—and they look pretty good—but I wonder if
we’re really saving any money overall,” Jones says. “We seem to get hit
constantly with handling fees, such as charges for less-than-full containers,
that weren’t in our initial contract. We also pay a lot to expedite shipments
by air. Sometimes we’re forced to air-ship something because a scheduled
delivery hasn’t arrived and we can’t see where it is—and then, more often than
not, within a day of receiving the product by air, the sea shipment arrives.
We’re also paying way more in taxes and duties than we did in the past. I have
to wonder if all these charges are legitimate.”
Refining the issues
Brooks
A. Bentz
Partner, Supply Chain Management
Accenture LLP
TechBrilliance is, in a manner of speaking, in the same boat with many other
companies that source products overseas. They have forecasted significant
benefits from the lower manufacturing costs associated with producing in
low-cost countries, but at the same time they have both substantially
lengthened their supply chains.
The number of trading partners in a domestic supply chain, in most instances,
is probably two: producer and transporter. The number of trading partners in an
international supply chain can be many more.
Visibility is a critical component of managing the supply chain on the
international stage. In the domestic environment, visibility is simplistic:
pick up the freight, haul the freight, deliver the freight; with all this
taking place over a day or two, or in rare instances a week. International
shipments can easily consume 20–30 days, or more and with the significantly
greater number of hand-offs, there is much greater propensity for delays and
errors.
Visibility is, in theory, a way to track specific shipments, down to the SKU
level from origin to destination, which on the face of it, solves all of the
conundrums facing TB.
The fact is, and will—at least in short run—remain, that there are holes in the
system. Cost is generally a key driver in this sort of supply chain decision.
The third-party service provider is under price pressure to offer its services
and as a result deals with an array of contract carriers that are also expected
to be highly competitive. But, the only way these annoying holes get filled is
by having at least a minimal level of connectivity so that each link and node
in the supply chain is an accurately and timely recorded event.
The next big step is in predictive monitoring. This means, for example, a
report advising the shipment from the plant is late getting to the
consolidator. This information is best BEFORE the event occurs, rather than—as
TB discovered—after the fact, when options are foreclosed and only emergency
expediting will suffice.
In the final analysis, the key advice for TB is embodied in a few key points:
Conduct a full review of the existing 3PL contract provisions and identify the
gaps between promises and expectations;
Convene a summit meeting with the key 3PL senior executives to discuss the gaps
identified and develop a plan to address them; and
Of course, there’s a chance the 3PL will not be able to meet the necessary
objectives, in which case TB will need to go through the process of finding a
replacement. n
Rick Blasgen
President and CEO
The Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals
First, TechBrilliance must understand the concept “lowest delivered total
cost.”
All too often, decisions are made based upon one particular supply chain cost
bucket at the expense of total cost and service implications. For example, if a
million dollars is saved in manufacturing/procurement expenses through “new”
negotiated supplier arrangements, yet inventory levels/carrying
costs/transportation expenses skyrocket due to extending the supply chain, the
impact on the total enterprise can be negative.
There is also a significant cash flow impact as well—one dollar added to
inventory is a dollar reduction in cash flow.
So, what to do? TechBrilliance should get back to the table with its suppliers,
revisit the initial reasons for its supply chain alterations, and create a
joint plan to deliver common, measurable goals among key participants.
Detailed measures, like what’s really meant by on-time delivery, need to be
spelled out and committed to by the service providers. TechBrilliance must also
develop contingency plans for the inevitable failure given the extended supply
chain.
TechBrilliance’s key employees should also attend “cultural training” with
primary suppliers. n
Karen Butner
Supply Chain Management Lead, IBM Institute for Business Value
How agile is the TechBrilliance supply chain? Do they have the right key
performance indicators? Can their organization measure the quality of
decision-making over time? Do their metrics provide a perspective on where they
can gain greater visibility in their business?
If the answers to these questions are “not very,” and “no,” then we believe the
solution lies in “services,” the fundamental building blocks for SOA, or
service-oriented architecture. Services are pieces of application functionality
that represent a repeatable, categorically containable business task.
The service is only built and maintained in one place. Other applications can
access this service and incorporate it into their own functionality. For
example, the more complex applications of “order management” or “shipping and
delivery fulfillment” must both utilize a function to update a customer’s
information. In this case, both the order and shipping application would call
upon the same “customer information” service to complete the task. The benefit
of this is that the common function only needs to be built once, maintenance of
the service does not need to be duplicated, and when the service is upgraded,
all user applications and systems receive the upgrade. This usage is considered
service orientation.
Why go through all this trouble? Service-oriented architecture can enable
companies to more rapidly respond to market and operational impetus.
Real-time visibility of supply chain transactional event information allows
rapid identification of root causes of issues. Proactively monitoring ongoing
supply chain information and events can advise managers of potential “out of
tolerance” situations before they occur. n
Steve Lyman
Partner, Business Advisory Services, Grant Thornton LLP
Never underestimate the importance of rigorous due diligence when selecting a
logistics partner! It appears that TechBrilliance focused more on the actual
freight rates rather than looking at the total cost of ownership (“TCO”). Due
to the poor service from their LSP, the TCO must now also include expenses to
expedite shipments, labor expenses for tracking down inventory, and the
potential cost of losing customers.
What should TechBrilliance do to rectify this code-red situation?
The highest priority should be to satisfy customer needs and make the issues as
transparent as possible while they are being resolved. They are expediting
shipments via air to meet customer demands, which is necessary, but this is
expensive and will quickly lead to inventory problems. To prevent the situation
from further ballooning out of control, work closely with its current LSP to
resolve the issues.
TechBrilliance should consider a contingency plan if they are unable to resolve
issues with their current LSP. Their evaluation should include an analysis of
the total cost of ownership and an understanding of all potential charges
TechBrilliance needs to evaluate the potential LSP’s use of technology as part
of their overall solution. Defined service level agreements with penalties
should be established.
And get tax help! The arena where
TechBrilliance operates has an abundance of tax complexities and opportunities.
Adrian Gonzalez
Director, Logistics Executive Council, ARC Advisory Group
As TechBrilliance is discovering, globalization and outsourcing come with a
price. Simply put, TechBrilliance is no longer the master of its own destiny;
it depends on its suppliers, logistics service providers, and other trading
partners for success.
If it’s any consolation, TechBrilliance’s visibility problems are not uncommon.
One contributing factor is the lack of electronic communication in developing
countries. Implementing a “visibility” software solution is the easy part;
getting the data, from the multitude of parties involved in a global shipment,
is the real challenge.
So, where to begin? TechBrilliance should “staple itself to an order,” as
Benson Shapiro et al. advocate in their famous Harvard Business Review article.
In other words, the company should map its entire order-to-cash process to
obtain a detailed understanding of all the information, physical, and financial
flows involved. Who are all the parties in the supply chain? What data and
documents need to be exchanged? How are the products routed from origin to
final destination? You’d be surprised how many companies cannot answer these
questions.
TechBrilliance should work collaboratively with its strategic vendors, as well
as its Logistics Service Provider (LSP), to map the value chain of their key
products. The team should apply Lean and Six Sigma principles to streamline
processes, eliminate waste, and reduce process “defects” and variability. Then
clearly define and communicate its information requirements to all parties; it
should then establish metrics to ensure compliance. Finally, TechBrilliance
should evaluate its current software capabilities and determine if additional
investment is required to manage this process. n
Valerie Bonebrake
Executive Vice President, Chief Logistics Officer
YRC Logistics
The first step in getting the most out of your supply chain is to take a step
back and look at your supply chain strategically. There should be a clear
alignment of the logistics goals and objectives with the company’s business
model.
To drive goal alignment, you must both gain a clear understanding of your
customers and evaluate the growth and profit drivers of the company. What are
your customer types and their respective distribution channels, buying
behaviors, and satisfaction drivers? What are your company’s short-term and
long-term growth initiatives? What are your new product and new markets, their
respective revenue and profit ratios, and their competitive environments?
Getting the most out of the supply chain means collaboration on an even broader
level than ever before, both internally and externally. More and more often,
collaboration is necessary not only between the company and a single provider
or supplier, but across the providers and suppliers.
This is a new dynamic for many organizations. Companies that may have leveraged
the competitive nature of their suppliers are now asking those same suppliers
to collaborate. And those suppliers must now be comfortable working together
when they previously may have only viewed themselves as competitors. Internal
collaboration can include but is not exclusive to executives, finance, sales,
marketing, engineering, product development, IT, purchasing, production, and
customer service. Some logistics teams may more naturally align and collaborate
with certain functional areas. But it’s oftentimes the other functional team
collaborations that will provide new insights.
The first key to success is setting standards across both internal and external
teams. Questions that should be addressed include: What are the changes that
are going to take place? What are the expectations of the changes? What are the
roles and responsibilities of the stakeholders? What are the measurables? What
are the contingencies?
The second key to success is clear, consistent communication to stakeholders
throughout the process. Good communication will both educate and motivate teams
as change is taking place. If a logistics service provider has to satisfy
“one-off” exceptions, there’s the risk value will be lost. Having a steering
committee and logistics council to represent stakeholders can help mitigate
this risk. N
Scott A. Dille
Senior Marketing Manager
OOCL Logistics, USA Inc.
Logistics service and technology have evolved to address increasingly
demand-driven global supply-chain networks. If the most important fundamentals
of global supply chain management are not taken into account, however, the
value of the most sophisticated techniques can be missed or rendered
ineffective.
OOCL Logistics begins by looking at our customer’s purchase order information
and shipment status visibility, applying the various elements of our technology
suite to provide monitoring from creation of purchase order to shipment
delivery. Part of the purchase order and shipment status process includes
managing issues with shipments departing and arriving outside of designated
shipping “windows.” OOCL Logistics’s Internet-based IT package exception
manages bookings, routings, as well as container sizes, shipping windows, and
load factors. Properly handling these events and hitting these important
milestones matter most in reducing costs and improving visibility.
Also fundamental is improving control and accuracy of shipment-related
documents. OOCL Logistics uses e-documents to streamline document distribution.
Often the issues most difficult to correct arise from overseas vendor
management. Proper communication reduces costs throughout the supply chain—from
manufacture to store shelf. Our IT suite and professional staff coordinate
shipment preparation at origin and offer direct vendor contact assistance.
We provide sophisticated, easy-to-use, on-line automated reporting
capabilities, linking every client with standard, company-wide or customized
reports regarding purchase orders and shipments status; these allow every client
to analyze and measure shipment-related activities and performance—and provides
valuable guidance for import network improvements, including ocean carrier
contracts, as well as, trucking and warehouse negotiations. n
Doug Hayden-Luck
Sales Director, International Intermodal, CN and the Port of Prince Rupert
The new Prince Rupert Fairview terminal opens up a new gateway for Asia-North
America trade. It is the first new gateway opened to this trade lane in the
last 100 years. The new terminal has the advantage of being located on the
great circle route from Asia, which cuts ocean shipping distance by over 1000
nautical miles.
CN has a long history in serving Prince Rupert. Exports and imports through
this port include coal, grain, and forest products. We have a high-capacity
rail line built to handle these extremely heavy commodities. The line is
currently underutilized and has sufficient capacity to handle not only the
first phase of Prince Rupert rated for 500,000 TEUs, but also a Phase 2
expansion rated at 2 million TEUs.
The first train of imports will leave Prince Rupert and be in Chicago on the
fifth morning and Memphis on the sixth morning. With this fast and reliable
transit time, coupled with the ocean sailing advantage, retailers and
manufactures will lower inventory carrying costs and improve overall supply
chain economics.
What will shippers value about the new Prince Rupert Gateway? First, expedited
routing from Asia to Continental North America. Second, the ability to circumvent
terminal and rail infrastructure problems in the United States. Third, cranes
and berth to handle 13,000-TEU ships at the deepest natural harbor in North
America. Fourth, efficient electronic data interchange from ocean manifest to
ocean terminal, ocean terminal to rail, and rail to Canadian and U.S. customs.
To directly support the Prince Rupert terminal, CN is investing $25 million in
the terminal’s rail-related infrastructure, $5 million in tunnel and bridge
upgrades, $24 million in new intermodal terminals in Prince George and
Edmonton, and $100 million for new locomotives for just Prince Rupert service.
n
Kurt Pruitt
Vice President, Integrated Solutions, Maersk Logistics USA Inc.
The ink is still dry on the multi-year contract you have signed with your
global logistics provider, and already the boss is asking you to produce
evidence of the savings and benefits—but where to start? The greatest source of advice will in fact
come from the provider with whom you have just partnered. You don’t need to go
it alone. Utilize your 3PL.
In our experience, the following steps will assist you in capturing the
benefits of your service provider.
Help your service provider fully understand your overall business strategy. The
logistics function is critical; it facilitates the sourcing and movement of
goods, information and financial transactions—and your 3PL must understand the
necessary collaboration among internal departments.
Share your company’s global sourcing strategy with your service provider. Your
3PL can provide key insight into local in-country issues, which could impact
your sourcing decisions. Such issues range from infrastructure to political
stability, raw materials supply, and customs developments. These issues can
impact the predictability of inbound product and the corresponding safety-stock
levels.
The major underlying client benefits of a 3PL include a single point of
contact, an existing global infrastructure to leverage and the availability of
local expertise.
Additionally, 3PLs provide sophisticated IT systems, which can provide solid
business intelligence to manage a global supply chain.
A leading 3PL should also be able to benchmark your current supply chain
performance against others in your industry.
A 3PL can help effectively integrate your domestic infrastructure with your
international logistics platform. Questions such as which ports of entry, how
information is exchanged with warehouses, and how product is merged for final
delivery can best be resolved with your service provider. n
Tom Jones
Senior Vice President and General Manager of
Supply Chain Solutions
Ryder
When we look at a customer, the first thing we do is form a virtual picture of
their entire supply chain. Your purchasing department may have data on your
suppliers, your sales department may have your customer database, but often
they’re not interfaced together for meeting total requirements on shipping.
That’s still a struggle for many companies.
It used to be, you said, “I need a truck from Chicago to St. Louis.” Now, if
you’re shipping product from China to Chicago, it goes inland from Shanghai to
the port; it gets containerized and goes across ocean on a ship; it goes from
dock to warehouse to truck to distribution center to final destination. It’s a
much longer chain.
You have to have the supply chain “brain” that distributes the commands to the
physical supply chain muscle: trucking, shipping, distribution, and so on.
You’ve got to have a thought process and you’ve got to transmit that thought
process to the muscles—the physical supply chain—that can carry it out.
Supply chain management isn’t just a cost reduction activity. It’s a revenue
enhancing activity. You’re meeting the needs of your customers. You’re getting
the product on your shelf when your customers want it. What differentiates most
products? Not price or capability, but being there. If your product is stuck in
the port or someplace else, you’re going to lose revenue. n
Jeannie S. Jump
Corporate Communications Coordinator
Saia, Inc.
As one of the nation’s most successful less-than-truckload carriers, our
mission is to fulfill our customer’s shipping needs and improve their chain of
supply.
Each month we track, measure, evaluate and publish our performance in the areas
of on-time delivery, pick-up performance, claims-free service, proof of
delivery, claims settled within 30 days, and invoicing accuracy for every
customer. They’re important to the customer because they measure the quality of
the service we provide them. They’re important to us because they tell us how
well we are performing.
There are several standard performance metrics carriers should be monitoring
and sharing with their customers. For instance, performance reports track
on-time pick up and delivery. These can be further segregated to show the
performance in a particular lane or state. By doing this, customers can
identify problem areas. Through claims reporting and settlement reports,
customers can monitor the number of claims they have against their total number
of shipments.
Our research has shown that customers want details concerning their
shipments—quickly and accurately. That’s what we provide through our Web site.
All the data, reports, and notifications we provide are accessible to anyone.
No platform or software is needed to implement our value-added programs.
We also offer dynamic transit times that we continuously monitor and, if
necessary, adjust to meet customer needs. Most of our shipments are delivered
in one and two-day lanes.
We encourage our customers to be proactive. As a best-in-class carrier, we try
to anticipate customer questions and proactively provide information in a
timely and effective manner. n
Greg Lehmkuhl
Vice President, Global Automotive
Menlo Worldwide
Between 3PLs and customers, the kind of contract we’re seeing more and more, is
a strategic relationship, or 4PL. How you move material and how you move
information throughout the organization and supply chain is the nature of
strategic supply chain management. When a customer is ready to align with a 3PL
at that high and broad a level, it’s a serious commitment.
What drives a customer to do that?
First, functional silos within their organization are driving value stream
inefficiencies. For example, purchasing isn’t working well with manufacturing,
or manufacturing isn’t coupled with distribution. Companies looking to source
globally may not have the expertise to do it or do it well.
Next comes cost pressure or lack of internal supply chain knowledge. The
overall value chain may be too expensive to allow a company to continue to
compete in the global marketplace. As inventory goes down, customer
requirements are increasing. The need for supply chain knowledge in an
organization is extremely high and it’s hard for companies to acquire and
retain that expertise internally.
Now, what does Menlo need from customers to be successful?
The beginning of any relationship is identifying the needs of the customer. You
need to be able to give your 3PL time with key leaders to get alignment on
vision, mission and goals. Next, customers must commit to using the
relationship with the 3PL to fundamentally change their company. If you really
want to advance your supply chain, it’s going to touch every aspect of
operations: purchasing, sales, finance, engineering, IT, manufacturing, and so
on.
Once you have a clear alignment on the vision and the mission, you then need to
assign dedicated functional support. n
Howard Finkel
Executive Vice President, Trade Division, COSCO Container Lines Americas
The term “partnership” is an overused cliché in the shipping industry; however,
in today’s sophisticated and fast moving supply chain, a true partnership mentality
will go a long way in making sure a shipper gets the most out of a carrier’s
service.
Prior to signing a service contract, I would hope the shipper has established a
good relationship with their sales rep and is familiar with who at the carrier are
their “Go-To” people when a problem arises. Some carriers are far too reliant
on automated phone services to provide the bulk of their customer service.
These systems, while extremely helpful in providing info for tracking and
tracing, may fall way short on info when a problem arises that cannot be
automated (e.g., U.S. Customs has called for an exam on a shipper’s box and the
shipper wants to know what’s happening and what the procedures are).
Negotiating weekly volumes in your service contract is another extremely
important factor in what kind of service you will get from your carrier. Just
stating an annual MQC in your contract does little to help the carrier to plan
if a shipper has certain heavy seasons where they will book large volumes and
somewhere there volume will drop off. If the carrier knows when the heavy
periods are along with the lulls, they can plan for equipment needs and try to
match back volumes so they can have a more balanced operation.
An increasing amount of cargo today is offered on an intermodal basis. Does
your carrier have a large enough staff to handle their intermodal operations?
Remember: the carriers for the most part don’t control these intermodal
services, so they need to have a good staff watching this business carefully.
Make sure your carriers have a broad range of ports both on the West and East
Coasts along with the Gulf. If there is congestion or a problem with a
particular port, your carrier should be able to quickly come up with a
contingency plan. wt
|